AI Transparency
Neon Lace uses AI tools in parts of our research and production workflow. This page explains where AI appears, what remains human-led, and how I protect credibility.
What AI may support
AI may be used to:
- help organise research notes and early outlines
- generate draft structures for articles, reports, and PDFs
- support editing tasks (clarity, flow, formatting)
- assist with idea expansion and variant drafts (headlines, captions, summaries)
AI is treated as a production tool, not the author.
What is always human-led
Neon Lace remains human-led in:
- editorial judgement (what matters, what doesn’t, and why now)
- voice, tone, and final phrasing
- factual checking and source selection
- cultural interpretation (rooms, routes, access systems, signals, preparation)
- final approval — nothing is published without review
If it doesn’t sound like Neon Lace, it doesn’t make the cut.
Standards I don’t compromise
I do not:
- fabricate access, affiliations, experiences, or “insider” positioning
- publish claims without evidence when evidence is available
- use AI to imitate identifiable writers or steal protected text
- use AI output as a substitute for editorial responsibility
When I state a claim, I aim to back it with a cited report, a price point, a quote, a visible behaviour pattern, or a referenced case study.
AI visuals and styling
When I publish AI-generated fashion visuals, I try to always include this disclosure or similar:
“Styled with AI. All visuals are original creations for Neon Lace.”
If an image is from a brand, photographer, or partner, we credit it clearly.
Why I disclose
Neon Lace is building long-term editorial trust. Transparency is part of that. I’d rather be clear about process than hide behind mystique.
November, 2025

Sherelle,
Founder | Creative Director | Voice Custodian